Archive for Google

comScore Reveals U.K. Top Sites for October 2006

comScore Networks, a leader in measuring the digital age, has revealed the top U.K. Internet properties for October, based on data collected through its comScore World Metrix audience ratings service.  Google Sites (not including YouTube) edged out Microsoft Sites in October to become the most-visited Web property in the U.K. for the first time, followed by Microsoft Sites and eBay.

“We have watched the popularity of Google consistently grow over time,” said Bob Ivins, managing director of comScore Europe.  “While the current month-over-month increase was small, it was just enough to earn them the number one spot.”

Added Ivins: “Also notable was YouTube’s 24 percent increase in traffic in October.  YouTube’s ascent in popularity around the world and in the U.K., demonstrated by the site’s month-after-month double-digit percentage increases, has been remarkable.”

Google in talks to buy YouTube

Google is reported to be in talks to buy popular video-sharing website YouTube for $1.6bn (£856m).

The Wall Street Journal said discussions between the two sides were at a sensitive stage and the talks could break up, neither Google nor YouTube have made any comment on this as of yet.

Founded by three former employees of eBay’s PayPal electronic payment unit, YouTube has denied previous rumours of a takeover.

YouTube chief executive Chad Hurley said earlier this year that the company was not for sale and a future share flotation was possible.

Launched in February 2005, YouTube has grown quickly into one of the most popular websites on the internet, with 100 million videos viewed every day.

But a potential future problem for YouTube and any buyer, is that a great many users put up their favourite music videos and film clips, for which they have not gained copyright approval.

Via: BBC News

Want to look 10 Years Younger?

The team of Channel 4’s hit show ‘10 Years Younger’ is currently looking for lively people to take part in their brand new series! So if you think you look old before your time and you want a makeover of a life time… APPLY NOW! For information and an application pack, go to www.channel4.co.uk/10yearsyounger or call 0121 2248381.

The 10 Years Younger Team are also keen to hear from people that are interested in non-surgery anti-ageing treatments.

Could Microsoft Beat Google to the Healthcare Service Line?

According to Mary Jo Foley from Microsoft-Watch, Microsoft is set to announce a number of new healthcare products and initiatives on July 26 during a press event in Washington, D.C. But Microsoft officials have declined to specify exactly what Peter Neupert, Microsoft’s corporate vice president of Health Solutions, will unveil at next week’s event.

However it is thought that that Microsoft may be ready to revile plans of a Windows Live Healthcare service, the existence of which has been the subject of rumors for the past few months.

And while Google executives have been for the past few months dropping hints of a Google healthcare Service, as of yet nothings has surfaced and when questioned about it their reply is that they are just experimenting and have no service for immediate release.

So could this mean that if a Windows Live Healthcare if unveiled it could possible beat Google to the Healthcare line of services? After all MSN does already own a MSN Health and Fitness portal which could possibly be replaced by Windows Live Healthcare.

I would love to know what you think so please leave your thoughts in the comments section.

DMCA complaints on Google Search

Today while searching on Google for some windows live messenger winks, I came across a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) notice message at the bottom of the Google Search Results page, which goes as follows:

In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.

Now I don’t think I’ve ever seen one of these messages before on Google, so it was quite interesting to see one. Has anybody else ever seen a message like this for a search query and if so what did you search for?

And by the way yeas I know I was using Google and not Windows Live like I should be, considering I’m a Windows Live Fan, but I like to get results from various search engines! ;)

Update: Just found an interesting page on ChillingEffects.org that contains loads of DMCA Complaints against Google Search and Blogger.

Google becomes ‘evil’

I thought I would post something about Google today, and well it was either going to be about Google facing a lawsuit in Belgium over Google Suggest or this other piece of news I found with some Dilbert comics strips, I’ve chosen the comic strips, read below for the full story on what I’m talking about:

A series of recent Dilbert comics could be a sign of changing sentiment toward the Internet darling. The everyman office worker has gone from a Google worker in 2004 doodles Scott Adams did specially for Google, to a high tech start-up entrepreneur being terrorized by them.

After getting fired by his now billionaire dog, Dogbert, Dilbert has started a high tech company out of his garage. He has invented a search engine that matches singles by common searches. As he applies for a patent on his search algorithm, Dogbert warns him of Google wrath. Dilbert brushes off the warning as ridiculous, but a “back at Google” scene pokes fun at Larry Page’s and Sergey Brin’s recent interpretations of Google’s “Don’t be evil” company policy.

Via: Cnet News

Gtalkr instant messaging client is no more!

The Gtalkr instant messaging client is no more as yesterday the founders, Wes Carr and Dudley Carr who are brothers, shutdown Gtalkr to pursue new projects as Google employees.

Thank you for your interest in Gtalkr. Unfortunately, the Gtalkr instant messaging client is no longer available. The Gtalkr website has been taken down while we pursue new projects as Google employees. Thank you to everyone who tried out, regularly used, and supported Gtalkr. Here’s a list of alternate clients to be used to connect to the Google Talk IM service:

http://www.google.com/talk/otherclients.html

Sincerely,
Dudley Carr and Wes Carr (The Gtalkr team)

Via: Gtalkr Team Blog

Thanks goes once again to my friend randy for keeping me informed of interesting news happening on the net, like this one, if anybody else has any news they feel interesting enough for my blog please feel free to contact me!

Google wants special treatment in Internet Explorer 7 (IE7)

Google seems to want special treatment on Internet Explorer 7, according to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer.

His remarks centered on the default search engine in the Web browser. Right now, when people update their version of IE to IE 7, the software won’t change their default search settings. “If you pick Yahoo, it will stay on Yahoo,” Ballmer said in a hallway conversation Thursday, after a speech he gave at the Churchill Club here.

Google, however, has complained about how the system works. The complaints could be taken as a disguised way to help that company grow its segment in search, Ballmer suggested.

“Google wants us to prompt the users to change the defaults. They want to see a list of search providers, with the No. 1 search provider listed first,” said Ballmer, who was speaking generally and not recounting a formal meeting or discussion with Google executives.

IE 7 offers a list of search sites that can become a user’s default search engine. The list is alphabetical, so Google is listed after some (such as Ask.com) but before others, including MSN.com. IE 7 also doesn’t actively suggest to a user that they can change their default based on their recent search histories or other behavior.

Should Google really be complaining about this or yet crying about this, let me know your opinions by commenting to this post!

Via: Cnet

Update: The U.S. government has given its thumbs-up to Microsoft’s search box plans for Vista, shrugging off concerns raised recently by Google.

Via: Cnet

Amazon drops Google on A9 and Alexa in the US

A9 (Amazon’s search engine) and Alexa (online traffic monitoring service) have now replaced Google as their default search engine with Windows Live Search. There’s no official information about this change and it’s only seems to be viewable for people from the US but this is the first major success for the new Windows Live Search, the replacement for MSN Search especially as the A9 search engine powers web search at Amazon.com and IMDB.com.

Via: googlesystem.blogspot.com

The nonsense about AdSense

Benjamin Cohen, the former teenaged dot.com millionaire, has run into a problem as he tries to make his next million: Google won’t pay him for ads run on his website

This story sounds exactly like what happened to me and loads of other people on the web I know who are honest people that do not click there own ad’s and got banned from Google AdSense:

From day one, I integrated Google AdSense adverts on to PinkNews.co.uk. It instantly provided advertising that was both relevant to my readers and that fitted into the context of the website. In addition, I was able to weed out advertisers that I didn’t want my brand to be associated with, such as pornography and dating.

Sure enough, a couple of months later, a cheque for a couple of hundred pounds arrived from Google, which was duly banked and the funds cleared. So far, so good.

But a couple of days later, I was informed by e-mail that my AdSense account had been terminated due to “click fraud”, and that I would receive no further payments and be unable to use Google’s advertising products again.

After a number of e-mails to Google without replies and no response from their press office, I decided to cut my losses and concentrate on selling advertising direct to clients, thereby bypassing Google’s system.

Then a few months ago, I got chatting about my experiences with Google’s AdSense product with some friends in the industry and it became apparent that the false allegations of fraud were not unique to my business. I also learnt that some advertisers claim that money they spent on “fraudulent clicks” was never returned to them.

In order to test Google out, I signed up to Google AdSense once again. I was accepted, despite the fact that they had previously told me in no uncertain terms to never use their products again. I wrote to them to make sure that my site would meet their admission criteria. Trinh, from the American based AdSense team, checked us out and said that we were approved for the ads.

A couple of hundred dollars’ worth of revenue later, once again an e-mail from Google appeared in my inbox. It told me: “It has come to our attention that invalid clicks have been generated on the Google ads on your site(s). We have therefore disabled your Google AdSense account. Please understand that this step was taken in an effort to protect the interest of the AdWords advertisers.

“A publisher’s site may not have invalid clicks on any ad(s), including but not limited to clicks generated by:

“a publisher on his own web pages; a publisher encouraging others to click on his ads; automated clicking programs or any other deceptive software; a publisher altering any portion of the ad code or changing the layout, behavior, targeting, or delivery of ads for any reason.

“Practices such as these are in violation of the Google AdSense Terms and Conditions and program polices.

“Publishers disabled for invalid click activity are not allowed further participation in AdSense and do not receive any further payment. The earnings on your account will be properly returned to the affected advertisers.”

Now let’s be clear: I informed staff not to click on the Google ads, or indeed any other adverts on our site. We do not encourage others to click on the adverts, we do not run automated clicking programs nor had we altered any portion of the advertising code.

So seeking some sort of clarification from Google of which particular heinous offence our site was accused of committing, I wrote to the AdSense team asking them to explain what had happened.

In what I believe to be an automated reply, I was informed: “As you know, Google treats instances of invalid clicks very seriously. By disabling your account, we feel that we have taken the necessary measures to ensure that invalid clicks will not continue to occur on your site. Due to the proprietary nature of our monitoring system, we’re not able to disclose any specific details of these clicks.” I was also given the opportunity to appeal this decision but reminded that, “Google reserves sole discretion in considering whether to take any action on an appeal”.

By refusing to give details of the clicks involved, it was hardly going to be an easy job to explain why I felt that their decision was reached in error. However, I gave it a shot, explaining that: ” We do not click on our own adverts, we just wouldn’t have time. The Google AdSense revenue constitutes a tiny fraction of our revenue.

“In addition, you have provided no evidence of IP addresses of the relevant clicks, so I cannot double check that they were not clicked on by a member of staff by accident. All staff are however informed not to click on adverts displayed sold either by us or by agencies so as not to distort the click through ratio we achieve.”

As we suspected would be the case, Google denied the appeal. They said: “We understand that you wish to receive specific information regarding the invalid clicks we observed on your account. However, due to the proprietary nature of our algorithm, we cannot disclose any details about how our monitoring technology works or what specifics we found on your account.

“Publishers disabled for invalid click activity are not allowed further participation in Google AdSense. We appreciate your understanding.”

This left a number of questions in need of answers. Such as whether the money earned by PinkNews.co.uk was returned to the advertisers concerned. On this, Google was, at best, ambivalent: “Unfortunately, due to our confidentiality restrictions”, ah, those again, “we cannot provide you with a written declaration that the remaining earnings of your account will be returned to the affected advertisers.

“However, please be assured that the affected advertisers will be properly refunded in this way.” Hardly reassuring at all, really.

Even most calls to its press office are left unanswered. Google, as a virtual company, is largely uncontactable, and judging by this instance, pretty much unaccountable as well.

In particular, I am concerned at the fact that both advertisers and syndication partners are denied the right to audit the figures produced by Google. All you are provided is an average cost per click figure, together with the total revenue for the day.

Via: TimesOnline | Digg